{"id":1156,"date":"2018-05-20T17:37:11","date_gmt":"2018-05-20T15:37:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/?p=1156"},"modified":"2018-05-28T17:42:47","modified_gmt":"2018-05-28T15:42:47","slug":"rubio-y-gali-y-su-clinica-social-de-1899-precedente-de-una-sociologia-clinica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/rubio-y-gali-y-su-clinica-social-de-1899-precedente-de-una-sociologia-clinica\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00abRubio y Gal\u00ed y su Cl\u00ednica social de 1899: precedente de una Sociolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4 class=\"gmail_default\">Resumen<\/h4>\n<div class=\"gmail_default\">\u00abSociolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica\u00bb es el nombre de una propuesta relativamente joven en ciencias sociales. El t\u00e9rmino se atribuye al soci\u00f3logo y m\u00e9dico Louis Wirth, miembro de la Escuela de Chicago de Ciencias Sociales (principios del siglo XX), quien incorpora esta denominaci\u00f3n en el art\u00edculo de 1931 \u201cClinical Sociology\u201d (American Journal of Sociology). Fernando de Yzaguirre realiz\u00f3 un recorrido que indaga en los or\u00edgenes de esta propuesta y localiza otro art\u00edculo cient\u00edfico, tambi\u00e9n procedente de un m\u00e9dico de los entonces llamados \u00abhumanistas\u00bb, que se adelanta en 32 a\u00f1os en la expl\u00edcita alusi\u00f3n de Wirth a una \u201cSociolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica\u201d, y que consideramos merece ser rescatado. El autor es Federico Rubio y Gal\u00ed, un importante m\u00e9dico cirujano nacido en C\u00e1diz (Espa\u00f1a) en 1827, impulsor de la Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencias M\u00e9dicas, muy comprometido con una perspectiva de car\u00e1cter hol\u00edstico -abarcador, comprehensivo- en una \u00e9poca no precisamente facilitadora de posiciones \u00abcr\u00edticas\u00bb como la que este profesional representa. Aunque de forma relativamente marginal y censurada, tambi\u00e9n en su \u00e9poca exist\u00eda una preocupaci\u00f3n por problemas sociales, por \u00abmales sociales end\u00e9micos\u00bb, en palabras de Rubio y Gal\u00ed: el \u201ccaciquismo\u201d, la \u201canacronopat\u00eda\u201d, \u201cla dominaci\u00f3n\u201d o la \u201cheteropat\u00eda\u201d. Presentaremos esa inaugural sugerencia terminol\u00f3gica de Rubio y Gal\u00ed en su contexto de producci\u00f3n: desde la profesi\u00f3n m\u00e9dica y desde la perspectiva \u00abhumanista\u00bb. A partir de ah\u00ed, recuperamos no s\u00f3lo el t\u00e9rmino (la \u00abletra\u00bb) sino tambi\u00e9n la intenci\u00f3n (el \u00abesp\u00edritu\u00bb) y su conexi\u00f3n con la \u201cSociolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica\u201d.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<h4 class=\"gmail_default\">Abstract<\/h4>\n<div class=\"gmail_default\">\u201cClinical Sociology\u201d is the name of a relatively young proposal in social sciences. The term is attributed to the sociologist and physician Louis Wirth, a member of the Chicago School of Social Sciences (in the early twentieth century), who incorporates this denomination in his 1931 article \u201cClinical Sociology\u201d (American Journal of Sociology). Fernando de Yzaguirre made a visual tour that investigates the origins of this proposal and locates another scientific article, also coming from a physician of the so-called \u2018humanists\u2019, who advances in 32 years Wirth\u2019s explicit allusion to a \u201cClinical Sociology \u201c, and we think it deserves to be rescued. The author is Federico Rubio y Gal\u00ed, an important medical surgeon born in C\u00e1diz (Spain) in 1827, the promoter of the Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciencias M\u00e9dicas, and very committed to a holistic-comprehensive perspective, in a time not precisely favourable to \u2018critical\u2019 positions such as this professional represents. Although in a relatively marginal and censored way, at that time there was also a worry about social problems, around \u201cendemic social ills\u201d, in Rubio and Gal\u00ed\u2019s words: \u201ccaciquismo\u201d, \u201canacronopat\u00eda\u201d, \u201cdominaci\u00f3n\u201d or \u201cheteropat\u00eda\u201d. We will present this inaugural terminological suggestion of Rubio and Gal\u00ed in its production\u2019s context: from the medical profession and from the \u2018humanist\u2019 perspective. From there, we recover not only the term (the \u2018letter\u2019) but also the intention (the \u2018spirit\u2019) and its connection with \u2018Clinical Sociology\u2019.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<p><strong>Fernando de Yzaguirre, Matilde Fern\u00e1ndez-Cid (2017), \u00abRubio y Gal\u00ed y su Cl\u00ednica social de 1899: precedente de una Sociolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica\u00bb, <em>Psychofenia<\/em>, diciembre 2017, anno XX, n. 35-36\/2017, p. 97-113<\/strong> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/36633473\/Rubio_y_Gal%C3%AD_y_su_Cl%C3%ADnica_social_de_1899_precedente_de_una_Sociolog%C3%ADa_Cl%C3%ADnica\">accesible en linea<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"gmail_default\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Resumen \u00abSociolog\u00eda Cl\u00ednica\u00bb es el nombre de una propuesta relativamente joven en ciencias sociales. El t\u00e9rmino se atribuye al soci\u00f3logo y m\u00e9dico Louis Wirth, miembro de la Escuela de Chicago de Ciencias Sociales (principios del siglo XX), quien incorpora esta denominaci\u00f3n en el art\u00edculo de 1931 \u201cClinical Sociology\u201d (American Journal of Sociology). Fernando de Yzaguirre [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-amla-publi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1156"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1158,"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156\/revisions\/1158"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sociologie-clinique.org\/sp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}